Curaçao vs Gibraltar
These are opposite approaches to a low-tax licence. Curaçao is an accessible Caribbean hub, mid-transition to direct licensing under its 2024 LOK, with roughly 2% corporate tax and no GGR gaming tax. Gibraltar is a selective British Overseas Territory, reformed by its Gambling Act 2025, limited to established operators at a 0.15% duty.
Key differences
- Selectivity: Curaçao licenses widely and quickly; Gibraltar restricts entry to established operators with local substance.
- Reputation: Gibraltar is a long-standing hub with rigorous vetting; Curaçao is rebuilding credibility through its 2024 statutory reform.
- UK exposure: Gibraltar operators serving Great Britain pay UK Remote Gaming Duty of 40%; Curaçao carries no such tie.
Curaçao suits newer or cost-sensitive operators wanting one licence across verticals and a fast route to market.
Full Curaçao profile →Gibraltar suits established operators that can meet substance requirements and want a reputable, ultra-low-duty base.
Full Gibraltar profile →Common questions
How is online gambling taxed in Curaçao compared with Gibraltar?
Curaçao: ~2% effective corporate income tax; 0% gaming tax on GGR (base: Net profit (corporate income tax)). Gibraltar: 0.15% gaming duty (base: Gross profits / gaming yield (stakes minus winnings)).
Who regulates online gambling in Curaçao and Gibraltar?
Curaçao is regulated by Curaçao Gaming Authority (CGA); Gibraltar by Gibraltar Gambling Division (Licensing Authority & Gambling Commissioner) (GGD).
Which has the longer licence term, Curaçao or Gibraltar?
Curaçao: Up to 5 years (transitional/provisional licences shorter). Gibraltar: Annual (renewable).
More head-to-heads
Sources (8)
Figures drawn from the Curaçao and Gibraltar profiles · verified 2026-08-07
Not legal or tax advice. This is a neutral teaching comparison; confirm every figure against the primary regulator (Curaçao Gaming Authority; Gibraltar Gambling Division (Licensing Authority & Gambling Commissioner)) before relying on it. 18+.